Saturday, April 27, 2024

Autobiography of Donald Harvey Marks

Donald Harvey Marks, an Autobiography


Donald Harvey Marks
(born June 27, 1949) is an American physician, scientist, author and advocate for social justice He is a husband (Diane Christine Bingham, married 1972), the proud father of three children (Brandon Ellis, Travis Dustin and Britni Kalin), and a grandfather. He had a number of major discoveries in his life, principle of which was applying the concept of cognitive engrams for interpretation of functional MRI data to human thought. (see Patents).

Family: 
Parents are Dorothy Greenberg Marks and Richard Leo Marks, of Buffalo, NY.
Marks has one brother (Stephen, deceased), one sister (Sharon), three children (Brandon Ellis, Travis Dustin and Britni Kalin) and 5 grandchildren: Connor, Lukas, Madelyn, Dylan and Rosie. I am also blessed with two wonderful daughter-in-laws Erika and Kristie, and son-in-law Mark Bentley.

Link to video Odyssey presentation on my life https://www.youtube.com/live/fwiYM-yZcsQ?si=W3nrw-VQJSDrfs8_


Early Life

Don Marks was born in Buffalo, New York in 1949. He grew up in Buffalo, Erie County, New York and in Los Angeles, California. He is a graduate of PS 66 in Buffalo, NY and of Hollywood High School (1967), Hollywood, California.

After graduating from (now) California State University San Bernardino with a B.A. in 1972, he attended the (now) Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Human Genetics at UCLA. He received a doctorate in philosophy (Ph.D.) in 1977, on the subject of comparative immunology of graft rejection. Marks attended the David Geffin School of Medicine at the University of California in Los Angeles, and graduated in 1980 with a medical degree (M.D.). He had completed Internal Medicine internship and residency at the USAF Medical Center, Keesler AFB, MS.

Don Marks is licensed to practice medicine in New Jersey. He is a Diplomat of the American Board of Internal Medicine and an Emeritus Fellow of the American College of Physicians.

Military Career

      Marks was in the Air Force ROTC and Civil Air Patrol while in high school, and served 6 years in the California Air National Guard after graduation from HS and while in undergraduate college. He attended basic training at Lack!and AFB and aircraft engine school at Sheppard AFB. He was a flight engineer on C-97 and C-130 aircraft.
     He had a military scholarship to attend medical school, and attended the Officers Candidate School Medical Indoctrination for Medical Service Officers. He also completed the Air Command and Staff College, and the Biological Warfare Courses.
     Marks was honorably discharged and is a proud third generation veteran.

Pharmaceutical Industry Career

     Marks is the former Associate Director of Clinical Research, Antibacterials of Hoffmann-LaRoche Pharmaceuticals, and the former Director of Clinical Research for adult vaccines at Aventis Pasteur Vaccines (formerly Connaught Pasteur Merieux). Research projects centered around application of antibiotics to treat Lyme disease and adult vaccines for Lyme disease and influenza.

Biotech and Neurotech Career
He was the Senior Vice President, Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs at Emerging Technology Partners, which was the biotech division of Economic Development Partnership of Alabama. He participated in the founding and initial scientific direction for vaccine companies Vaxin Inc. (www.Vaxin.com) and Tranzyme, Inc.
He was the founder and CSO of Millennium Magnetic Technologies, MMT Neurotech, LLC http://www.MilMag.net which  commercialized his discovery of interpreting human thoughts with functional MRI.

Intellectual Property
     1) Vaccination by topical application of genetic vectors. China 98809932, November 22, 2000. D-C C Tang; D H Marks; D T Curiel; UAB Research Foundation.

     2) Noninvasive genetic immunization, expression products therefrom and uses thereof. US 6348450, February 19, 2002. De-Chu Tang, Donald H. Marks, et al.

     3) Vaccination by Topical Application of Genetic Vectors. US 06706693, March 16, 2004. De-Chu Tang, Donald H. Marks, et al.

     4) Noninvasive genetic immunization, expression products therefrom, and uses thereof. US 06716823, April 6, 2004: Tang, De-chu C.; Marks, Donald H.; Curiel, David T.; Shi, Zhongkai.

     5) Brain Function Decoding Process And System. US 7,627,370, December 1, 2009. Marks, Donald H.

6) Brain Function Decoding Process And System. Marks, Donald H. Patent application filed March 25, 2010, US Serial No. 12/731,264, claiming priority to the application filed on March 30, 2009, and assigned Serial No. 61/164,724.

Academic Affiliations

     University of Alabama at Birmingham, Clinical Assistant Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and also Biomedical Engineering.

     Wallace Kettering Neuroscience Institute, Kettering, OH, former visiting Research Associate.


Non-Science PUBLICATIONS

Einstein, Relativity and Relative Ethics. http://bit.ly/2HC5YEN

Jonas Salk, Polio Vaccine and Vaccinating Against Hate. My take. http://bit.ly/2HE5bDl

Personal thoughts on longevity v reputation v meaningful accomplishments. "What I have not told my family about the meaning of time." http://bit.ly/2HDQDUb

Transit States. Collected poetry of DH Marks. https://www.amazon.com/Transit-States-D-Marks-ebook/dp/B011LM9NFI

A complete listing of all of his publications can be found at www.dhmarks.blogspot.com

                              Scientific Publications 

  1. TenEyck R, Schaerdel AD, Lynett JE, Marks DH, et al: Stroma-free methemoglobin solution as an antidote for cyanide poisoning. A preliminary study. Clinical Toxicology 21(3):343-358, 1984.
  1. Marks DH, et al: Pelvic hematoma after intercourse while on chronic anticoagulation. Annals of Emergency Medicine 13:554-556, 1984.
  2. Marks DH, Patressi J, Chaudry IH: Effect of pyridoxalated stabilized stroma-free hemoglobin solution on the clearance of intravascular lipid by the reticuloendothelial system. Circulatory Shock 16:165-172, 1985
  3. Marks DH, et al: Pyridoxalated polymerized stroma-free hemoglobin solution for hemorrhagic shock in dogs. Military Med. 152(5):265-271, 1987
  4. Marks DH, et al: Antibody Response to Transfusion With Pyridoxalated glutaraldehyde-treated Hemoglobin Solution. Mil Med 152(9):473-477, 1987.
  1. Davidson IJA, Drukkerr S, Hedlund B, Marks DH et al: Deleterious Effects of Stroma-free Hemoglobin Used As Resuscitative Fluid For Rats With Ischemic Intestinal Shock. Crit Care Med 16(6):606-609, 1988.
  1. Moore GL, Marks DH, et al: Ascorbate-2-phosphate in Red Cell Preservation: Clinical Trials and Active Components. Transfusion 26(3):221-225, 1988.
  1. Marks DH, Cooper TMakovec T,et al.: Effect of Polymyxin B on in vivo hepatoxicity of hemoglobin. Mil Med 154(4):180-184, 1989.
  1. Keller, D, Koster, FT, Marks, DH et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Outer Surface Protein A Lyme Vaccine. JAMA, June 8, 1994, p 1764-1768.
  1. Sigal LH, Zahradnik JM, Lavin P, Patella SJ, Bryant G, Haselby R, Hilton E, Kunkel M, Adler-Klein D, Doherty T, Evans J, Molloy PJ, Seidner AL, Sabetta JR, Simon HJ, Klempner MS, Mays J, Marks D, Malawista SE A vaccine consisting of recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface protein A to prevent Lyme disease. Recombinant Outer-Surface Protein A. Lyme Disease Vaccine Study Consortium. N Engl J Med (1998 Jul 23) 339(4):216-22.
  1. Kanesa-thasan N, Smucny JJ, Hoke CH, Marks DH, Konishi E, Kurane I, Tang DB      Vaughn DW, Mason PW, Shope RE.   Safety and immunogenicity of NYVAC-JEV and ALVAC-JEV attenuated recombinant Japanese encephalitis virus--poxvirus vaccines in vaccinia-nonimmune and vaccinia-immune humans. Vaccine (2000 Oct 15) 19(4-5):483-91.
  1. VanKampen KR, Shi Z, Gao P, Zhang J, Foster KW, Chen DT, Marks D, Elmets CA, and Tang DC. 2004. Safety and immunogenicity of adenovirus-vectored nasal and epicutaneous influenza vaccines in humans. Vaccine. 2005 Jan 11;23(8):1029-36.
  1. Marks DH, Adineh M, Gupta S: Determination of Truth from Deception Using Functional MRI and Cognitive Engrams. The Internet Journal of Radiology [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 2006. Volume 5, Number 1.
  1. Marks DH, Adineh M, Wang B, Gupta S, Udupa JK. Multidimensional Representation of Concepts as Cognitive Engrams in the Human Brain. The Internet Journal of Neurology [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 2007. Volume 6, Number 1.
  1. Marks DH, Adineh M, Wang B, Gupta S. Use of fMRI to Predict Psychiatric Adverse Effects of Interferon Treatment for Hepatitis C. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2007:3(5) 655-667.
  1. Marks DH. Cardiomyopathy Due to Ingestion of Adderall. American Journal of Therapeutics. Am J Ther. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):287-9.
  1. Marks DH. Depression Leading to Suicide As An Adverse Effect of Metoclopramide. Internet Journal of Gastroenterology [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 2007. Volume 5(2).
  1. Marks DH. Dangers of OTC Herbal Supplements: Dilated Cardiomyopathy after Ingestion of TRIAC (triiodothyroacetic acid, Tiratricol). Internet Journal of Endocrinology [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 2007. Volume 3(2).
  1. Marks DH and Milby J. Interferon and Risk for Drug-Seeking Behavior. Internet Journal of Pain, Symptom Control and Palliative Care [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 2009, 6(2).
Simultaneously published by agreement in The International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, Volume 20 (4), 2008, pp 231-240.

  1. Marks DH, Adineh M, Gupta S. MR Imaging of Drug-Induced Suicidal Ideation. Internet J Radiology [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet], 9(1). 2008. http://ispub.com/IJRA/9/1/10393
  1. Marks DH. Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment. Internet J Health. [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 8(1), 2008
  2. Marks DH, Allison J, Ahmed S, Jeffers LJ, Morgan JR, Morgan PM. The Association of Race/Ethnicity, Sex, and Comorbidity with Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Treatment Response, Internet Journal of Gastroenterology [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 7(2), 2008.
  3. Marks DH. Case Report: Drug Toxicity Leading to Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome and Cholestatic Jaundice. Internet Journal of Gastroenterology [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 2009, Vol 8(1).
  4. Marks DH, Valsasina P, Rocca M and Filippi M. Case Report: Documentation of Acute Neck Pain in a Patient Using Functional MR Imaging. Internet Journal of Pain, Symptom Control and Palliative Care [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 2010, Vol 8(1).
  5. Marks DH. Neurologic Complications of Vaccination with Outer Surface Protein A (OspA). Int J Risk Saf Med. 2011;23(2):89-96. doi: 10.3233/JRS-2011-0527.
  6. Marks DH. Drug Utilization, Safety and Clinical Use of Actos and Avandia. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2013 Jan 1;25(1):39-51. Review
  7. D H Marks, A Yildiz, S Vural, S Levy. Face Recognition, Reversible Correlation Between fMRI and Biometrics Data. The Internet Journal of Radiology. 2017 Volume 20 Number 1.


Non-Peer Reviewed Articles
  1. Marks DH. Evaluation of Medical Causation, in Drug Injury: Liability, Analysis and Prevention, 3rd and 4th Editions, O’Donnell JT editor. L&J Publications, 2012 and 2016. 
  1. Marks DH and Middlekoop T. Accutane: Focus on Psychiatric Toxicity and Suicide, in Drug Injury: Liability, Analysis and Prevention, Second Edition, Chapter 20. O’Donnell JT editor. L&J Publications, 2005


                               Medical Fiction, under the author's name of                                                  Dimitri Markov

     "Vera Mortina" - When the patient is not the sick one! Dangerous medical fiction about violence in hospitals, so real only a doctor could have written it.. https://amzn.to/2F89yng
     Interview with the author http://bit.ly/2JkXtk5

     "The Surrogate" Greedy docs pushing false hopes in infertility business. Contemporary medical fiction by Dimitri Markov https://amzn.to/2FSzyDv
     pb http://a.co/50QyD5Y

     "BloodBird" - When the organ is not the only thing transplanted! Immortality you don't want. Dangerous medical fiction available on Amazon & Kindle https://amzn.to/2Qe2n26

     "Her Charm Was Contagious," by Dimitri Markov, on Amazon & Kindle. A dangerous doctor and a patient who just loved everyone to death. Intense medical fiction only a doctor could write. https://amzn.to/2HJinqi

Donald H. Marks

Personal credo 2021 http://bit.ly/33sJ3J6


I completed the course Build Your Own Theology in 2021.

The ending assignment was for each to create their own credo - a statement of beliefs which guide our individual actions,  which follows: 

My personal credo

  • I believe in reason, ethics, social justice,

  • in the not-all-knowing power of science, and of facts over truth,

  • that we were made in God’s image, however we see God - as a creator, as a universal force of love, or in a more classic sense. To me, Psalm 18 means that we should see ourselves as part of nature in God, and God in ourselves, in the universality of life, and of God as a life force,

  • that God reflects ourselves, and we can see our reflection in God,

  • that no one can fool God, but we can certainly fool ourselves and those we care about most, at least for some relative amount of time. 

  • that God, our universal spirit, knows our hearts, and is revealed to us as required. 

  • that great peace can come from harmonizing our lives and our ethics with the rhythm and flow of the universal spirit,

  • that in addition to the 4 classic forces in nature (strong, weak, gravity, electromagnetic), that love, forgiveness, pride and the spirit of life are also very strong and very important forces,

  • I believe that there are absolute moral rights and wrongs, without which society will simply collapse, 

  • I object to and reject moral relativism and its consequence uncertainty, because they undermine my confidence in how I see morality, norms and values.  

  • I am suspect of following dispassionate logic and adopting absolutist principles in my life, 

  • that as a moral citizen, I see that truth (ethical, moral, theological) can be relative and situational, not always absolute. Truth, not being fact, by its very subjective nature is quite relative, and I see a range of truths and an open set of beliefs. 

  • I tend to see life, morality and truth as finely nuanced, complex and relative things that generally do not respond well to absolute laws, rules that don’t change or inflexible statements, 

  • I believe that truth is relative in the human and moral realms that I live in, simple answers often don’t exist, absolute statements don’t always work, and eternal truths are hard to come by, 

  • I can not know and control everything, and I fight to accept this and just be at peace. I accept that most moral and human issues defy absolute answers.

Donald Harvey Marks

June, 2021

Some of my related writings are on my personal blog 

https://bit.ly/2RVdpP2







Favorite books of DH Marks


                                                                                                           

Favorite Books and Recent Reads of

Donald H. Marks, physician and scientist (MD PhD) 

Reason, ethics, healthcare access⚕️, 3rd generation veteran

You can follow my personal readings of books📚 on Goodreads @DHMarks

Physics, Science

  • A Brief History of Time, and Brief Answers to the Big Questions. by Steven Hawkins. A little on the obtuse side, definitely not brief, but thought-provoking

  • Biochemistry, by Lehninger. 

  • Cosmos, by Carl Sagan

  • Gödel, Escher, Bach, by Hofstadter.

  • The ABC of Relativity, By Bertrand Russell.

  • Principles of Internal Medicine, Harrison.

  • The Innovators: how a group of inventors hackers geniuses and geeks created the digital revolution, by Walter Isaacson


The Truth, Fake News, Manipulation

  • An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for Domination. Sheera Frenkel.

  • How Fascism Works, the ultimate road map for us to avoid, by Jason Stanley. 

  • How Life Imitates Chess, making the Right moves from the board to the boardroom, by the brilliant Gary Kasparov, who IMO understands the context of everything. 

  • The Battle for your Brain: Defending the right to think freely in the age of neurotechnology." @NitaFarahany

  • The Cruelty is the Point: the past present and future of Trump's America, by Adam Serwer

  • Twilight of Democracy: the Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism, by Anne Applebaum. She lived with the subject and knows what she's talking about

  • The Mind Illuminated, by Culadasa. John Yates.

  • The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes

  • The Age of the Spiritual Machine, and The Age of the Thinking Machine, by Kurzweil

Fiction

  • Charm School, and The General’s Daughter, fiction by Nelson deMille

  • Crime and Punishment, and The Brothers Karamazov, fiction by Dostoyevsky

  • The Client, by Grisham

  • Undermoney, international political and financial fiction by Jay Newman. Link to my book review https://bit.ly/3Fa4wqb 

  • Doctor Zhivago, by Boris Pasternak 

  • Atlas Shrugged, and Fountainhead.  by Ayn Rand

  • All works by Shakespeare. 

  • The First Circle, by Alexander Solzhenitsyn

  • Presumed Innocent, fiction by Scott Turow. Easy fun reading with spicy use of colloquial

  • War and Peace, and Anna Karenina, greatest fiction by Tolstoy.

Economics, International Relations

  • On China, Does America Need a Foreign Policy?, World Order, and Kissinger on Kissinger, all by Henry Kissinger.

  • Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail, Ray Dalio, 2021.

  • Shadow State: murder mayhem and Russia's attack on the west, by Luke Harding

  • Three Dangerous Men: Russia China Iran and the rise of irregular warfare, by Seth Jones

  • Capital in the 21st Century, by Thomas Piketty

  • Sold Out, by James Rickards. 2022. Sold Out: How Broken Supply Chains, Surging Inflation and Political Instability Will Sink the Global Economy. Review

https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/james-rickards/sold-out-supply-chain/

  • Henry Kissinger and American Power: a political biography, by Thomas Alan Schwartz

  • 10 lessons for a Post-Pandemic World, by Fareed Zakaria

  • Kissinger on Kissinger, and Reflections on Diplomacy. Lord and Kissinger. BTW, if you think I am obsessed with Kissinger, which I am not, then in all fairness listen to my podcast on the subject http://bit.ly/3jlf76x

  • The End of the World Is Just the Beginning: Mapping the Collapse of Globalization, by Peter Zeihan, 2022.

  • Accidental Superpower, 10 years on. Peter Zeihan 


History

  • The Ascent of Man, Bronowski

  • The Fourth Turning is here, Howe

  • Imperial Hubris: why the West is losing the war on terror, Michael Scheuer

  • Dossier : The Secret History of Armand Hammer, by Edward Epstein 

  • Rich Man's War: Class, Caste, and Confederate Defeat in the Lower Chattahoochee Valley, by Williams

  • The New Jim Crow: mass incarceration in the Age of color blindness, by Michelle Alexander

  • The Age of Revolution.  Fareed Zakaria


Religion, Philosophy

  • No Other Gods, by Ana Lyons-Levy. A modern reinterpretation of the 12 commandments, putting them into more appropriate context

  • Jews don't Count, by David Baddiel



Artificial Intelligence


  • The age of AI and our human future. Kissinger, Schmidt, Huttenlocher

  • The Coming Wave. AI, synthetic biology and a new dawn for humanity, by Mustafa Suleyman.

Politics



  • Our Time is Now: power purpose and the fight for a fair America, by Stacey Abrams. By today's standards and examples, she and Al Gore never should have conceded.

  • Twilight of Democracy: the seductive lure of authoritarianism, by Anne Applebaum 

  • After the Apocalypse: America's role in a world transformed, by Andrew Bacevich

  • Al Franken, Giant of the Senate, by Al Franken. IMO, he gave up too easily

  • The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and his world, by Barry Green

  • Losing Military Supremacy: myopia of American strategic planning, by Andrei Martyanov

Making sense of loss
No death, no fear.

The beauty of what remains. How our  greatest fear becomes our greatest gift.  Stephen Leder.

Medical Fiction Books I have written, under the nom de plume of Dimitri Markov



List of my (Donald H. Marks) favorite movies

http://bit.ly/3cZSaSW


Additional writings of Donald H. Marks, physician-scientist



Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Therapy chatbots vs therapists. Alternative Options for hard-to-get Mental Health Support

Health


https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3l3k4l_0rW4WP5200

psychiatristPhoto byRapha WildeonUnsplash

In situations where there are not enough psychiatrists, psychologist and counselors available, it can be incredibly frustrating and challenging to get the help and support needed for mental health concerns. When it's impossible to secure an appointment or obtain prescription refills, it can exacerbate existing issues and lead to feelings of helplessness and despair. It's essential to explore alternative options for managing mental health, such as seeking therapy from other mental health professionals like psychologists or licensed counselors, joining support groups, practicing self-care techniques, and utilizing online resources for mental health support. Additionally, reaching out to primary care providers for interim help or exploring telehealth options may provide temporary relief.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2UoMhI_0rW4WP5200

anxietyPhoto byChristopher OttonUnsplash

It's crucial to prioritize mental health and continue advocating for improved access to psychiatric care for all individuals in need. In situations where mental health services are scarce, individuals may face significant barriers in accessing the help they need. This can lead to a sense of frustration and isolation, amplifying the challenges of managing mental health concerns. Exploring alternative avenues of support, such as connecting with therapists, engaging in self-care practices, and utilizing online resources, can offer valuable assistance during these times of limited psychiatric availability. Additionally, seeking interim support from primary care providers or considering telehealth options can provide temporary relief while waiting for more specialized care. By prioritizing mental health and advocating for improved access to psychiatric services, individuals can work towards creating a more inclusive and supportive system for those in need.

Can AI chatbots be used to address the shortage of psychiatrists, psychologists, and counselors?

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0bdQKS_0rW4WP5200

depressionPhoto byStormseekeronUnsplash

AI chatbots have the potential to help address the shortage of mental health professionals such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and counselors by providing a cost-effective and easily accessible form of support. These chatbots can offer immediate responses to individuals in need, providing them with resources, guidance, and coping strategies. They can also monitor patients' progress over time and alert human professionals when intervention is needed. Additionally, AI chatbots can help reduce the stigma associated with seeking mental health support, as some individuals may feel more comfortable confiding in a non-judgmental virtual assistant. However, it's important to note that AI chatbots cannot replace the level of care and empathy that trained mental health professionals can provide. They should be seen as a complement to traditional therapy rather than a replacement.

Proper training and oversight are necessary to ensure the effectiveness and ethical use of AI chatbots in mental health care. AI chatbots have the potential to revolutionize mental health care by reaching a larger population in need of support. Their 24/7 availability and anonymity can be particularly beneficial for those who may struggle to seek help through traditional means. By offering immediate responses and personalized resources, AI chatbots can empower individuals to take control of their mental well-being and access help when they need it most. However, it is crucial to integrate these chatbots into a comprehensive mental health care system that includes human professionals for more complex and nuanced issues that require deeper emotional understanding and empathy. Thus, the collaboration between AI technology and human expertise can pave the way for a more inclusive and effective mental health support network.

People who are poor, under-insured, minorities, without transportation or internet connection, and other access issues are as affected or even more so impacted by the overall lack of psych providers.

Individuals who are experiencing poverty, lack adequate insurance coverage, belong to minority groups, face challenges with transportation and internet access, or encounter other barriers to care, are significantly affected by the shortage of mental health providers, if not more so. These vulnerable populations not only have limited access to mental health providers, but they often face stigma and discrimination when seeking help. This further exacerbates their struggles in receiving the support and services they desperately need. The shortage of mental health providers also disproportionately impacts rural communities, where access to care is already limited due to geographical barriers and lack of resources. This creates a cycle of unmet mental health needs, leading to worsened mental health outcomes and increased rates of mental health crises among the most underserved populations.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1IMAaO_0rW4WP5200

chatbotsPhoto byLevart_PhotographeronUnsplash

Efforts to address the shortage of mental health providers should focus on expanding access to care in underserved areas, increasing funding for mental health services, and implementing programs to recruit and retain providers from diverse backgrounds. It is crucial to recognize the intersectionality of barriers that individuals facing poverty, discrimination, and other challenges may experience in accessing mental health support. By addressing these systemic issues and working towards a more inclusive and equitable mental health system, we can better support those who are disproportionately affected by the shortage of mental health providers.As always, your comments and feedback are welcome.

Certainly! Mental health chatbots have emerged as a valuable resource for individuals seeking support and guidance. Let’s explore a few of them:

  • Woebot:

  • Wysa:

    • Wysa is an AI chatbot designed to provide emotional support.

    • It offers coping strategies, mood tracking, and relaxation techniques.

    • Users can discuss their feelings, and Wysa provides evidence-based interventions.

    • It’s available 24/7 and can be a helpful companion during difficult moments.

  • Youper:

    • Youper combines AI with human expertise.

    • It engages users in conversations, helping them explore their emotions and thoughts.

    • Youper uses techniques from CBT, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and other therapeutic approaches.

    • It’s interactive, personalized, and aims to improve emotional well-being.

  • Kintsugi:

    • Kintsugi focuses on resilience and growth.

    • It encourages users to embrace their imperfections and learn from challenges.

    • Kintsugi provides mindfulness exercises, self-compassion practices, and positive affirmations.

Remember that while chatbots can be supportive, they are not a replacement for professional therapy. If you’re experiencing severe distress, consider reaching out to a licensed mental health professional.


Is voting for Nikki Haley equivalent to voting for Donald Trump?

Is voting for Nikki Haley equivalent to voting for Donald Trump?

by Donald H Marks, physician scientist

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v62Wn5NwEsSx4axk_CnVte-_z8iV0VeIKIKCbokJ-Gc/edit?usp=drivesdk

With Nikki Haley moving up in the polls, many have asked whether there is any difference between Nikki and the Donald. In the past, Nikki has definitely said that there is no difference, no daylight between her opinions and those of the Donald. Yet, there are IMO some major differences between Nikki Haley and TFG in terms of political views and style. Here are some examples:


- Haley has directly criticized Trump for his involvement in the US Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, and said he has no future in the GOP⁶. She also said that Trump's actions since Election Day "will be judged harshly by history" and that he "let us down" as a party and a country⁶.

- Haley has slammed Trump for his recent comments on Hezbollah, a militant group that is designated as a terrorist organization by the US and many other countries⁵. She said that Trump's praise for Hezbollah's leader Hassan Nasrallah was "a betrayal of our ally Israel and a gift to our enemy Iran"⁵. She also said that Trump's remarks showed that he has lost sight of who America's friends and enemies are⁵.

- Haley has a more conventional Republican message than Trump, who has often deviated from the party's orthodoxy on issues such as trade, immigration, foreign policy, and social issues⁴. Haley has emphasized her conservative credentials on fiscal responsibility, national security, pro-life, and pro-Israel stances⁴. She has also tried to appeal to a broader base of voters, including women, minorities, and moderates⁴.


These are just some of the differences between Nikki Haley and Donald Trump, so yes there is a difference and a point to be made when voting for one versus the other.


Source: Conversation with Bing, 11/30/2023

(1) Nikki Haley criticizes Trump and says he has no future in the GOP. https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/12/politics/nikki-haley-donald-trump-gop/index.html.

(2) ‘These are not good or smart people’: Haley slams Trump ... - POLITICO. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/28/these-are-not-good-or-smart-people-haley-slams-trump-on-praise-for-u-s-adversaries-00124102.

(3) Opinion | Why Nikki Haley Might Become Donald Trump’s Biggest Rival .... https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/11/02/mag-lowry-nikki-haley-00124866.

(4) Trump slams JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon for praising Nikki Haley. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-slams-jpmorgan-ceo-jamie-dimon-for-praising-nikki-haley/ar-AA1kMY4p.

(5) Donald Trump Melts Down Over Support for Nikki Haley. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/donald-trump-melts-down-over-support-for-nikki-haley/ar-AA1kNwhV.

(6) One Response at Nikki Haley Event That's a Warning Sign for Trump. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/one-response-at-nikki-haley-event-thats-a-warning-sign-for-trump/ar-AA1kNfWx.

(7) Getty Images. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/nikki-haley-in-conversation-with-all-due-respect-at-92nd-news-photo/1187294330.


Warnings of Suicide and Homicidal thought, anger agitation aggression irritability from prescription Medication, Antidepressants anti-anxiety anti-psychotics ADHA


Warnings of Suicide and Homicidal thought, anger agitation aggression  irritability as an adverse effect of prescription Medication such as Antidepressants, Anti-anxiety anti-depressants, ADHD and others 

by Donald H. Marks M.D. Ph.D. FACP


The following is taken from the discussion section of my (referenced) publications: 

New or worsening (psychiatric) symptoms can represent adverse effects of prescribed medications, rather than a progression of the underlying disease state. Patients and their families should be informed and warned, as I have urged (cited ref below).

The treating/prescribing physician of medications that Can cause CNS adverse events should perform an adequate medical and psychiatric history and evaluation to ascertain the risk for using these medications in each patient. Professional help should be sought from psychiatrists with a good knowledge of psychopharmacology and substance-induced mood disorder (SIMD). Consideration should be given to the consequences in each patient of inducing increased anxiety, aggression, agitation, anger, depression, hallucinations, impulsivity, irritability, paranoia, or suicidal or homicidal ideation.  IMO all patients who receive psych drugs, and their immediate family and caregivers, must receive specific warning about potential induction of CNS adverse events, including: anxiety, aggression, agitation, anger, depression, hallucinations, impulsivity, irritability, paranoia, suicidal or homicidal ideation. (Marks et al 2008)

Patients receiving these listed medications should be queried at regular intervals for the development of CNS adverse events, and appropriate follow-up should be performed. If a person receiving these medications develops new or heightened homicidal thoughts, it is important for the treating/prescribing physician to determine whether the medication should be discontinued. Patients developing CNS adverse events should be questioned concerning their degree of risk to themselves and others, and they should be requested to notify anyone who may be at risk from their actions. Professional psychiatric input should be considered. All these actions should be documented in the medical records.


References

Marks DH, Breggin PR. Braslow D. Homicidal Ideation Causally Related to Therapeutic Medications https://bit.ly/3x7yjtw  Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, Volume 10, Number 3, 2008


Marks DH. Depression leading to suicide as an adverse effect of metoclopramide. ISP Gastroenterology 2006 (5.2)  https://bit.ly/3x8dYEs 


Discovery of Using fMRI to Interpret Human Thoughts

Discovery of Using fMRI to Interpret Human Thoughts 

 Donald H. Marks, M.D., Ph.D  

The discovery that functional MRI studies can be applied to interpret thoughts originated with the breakthrough 2004-2005 research of Donald H. Marks. The first published documentation of these breakthrough concepts and enabling research first appeared in the following article: Marks DH, Adineh M, Gupta S: Determination of Truth from Deception Using Functional MRI and Cognitive Engrams. The Internet Journal of Radiology. 2006. Volume 5, Number 1.

My patent application on using fMRI for thought interpretation was filed 7/13/05, claiming priority benefit to 10/19/04. 

I presented my initial hypothesis on using fMRI to interpret thoughts to the Brain Imaging Group at the NIH, on May 26, 2004. Persons present at this meeting included Kriegeskorte. Other work published subsequent to my 2007 article, which also validate my concept of a library of Cognitive Engrams, include studies by Kay, Naselaris, Prenger & Galant 2007, and also Kriegeskorte et al 2007. The conceptual work first documented in my 2007 article envisions assembling a veritable Rosetta Stone of the mind, allowing two-way movement between actual imaging data and a database of brain activation maps created from neuroimaging studies. A wide range of faces, objects, places and concepts have unique activation map correlates, which are each termed Cognitive Engrams. The presence of specific Cognitive Engrams within neuroimaging data allows for the identification of the actual thought which led to a specific brain activation – a form of applied mind reading. 

Applications under development since this discovery include background and security checks, lie detection, and non-invasive interrogation (Marks DH et al: Determination of Truth from Deception Using Functional MRI and Cognitive Engrams. The Internet Journal of Radiology [peer-reviewed serial on the Internet]. 2006. Volume 5, Number 1). 

 The use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for thought interpretation has been a collaborative effort by many scientists. The development of fMRI in the 1990s is generally credited to Seiji Ogawa and Ken Kwong. Ogawa at the University of Minnesota published the first paper about the existence of the BOLD (Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent) brain signal. Then, at Massachusetts General Hospital, postdoctoral fellow Kenneth Kwong performed an experiment that produced what Martinos Center Director Bruce Rosen called “a eureka moment”. Furthermore, neuroscientist Marcel Just has made significant contributions to this field. His work with fMRI technology, along with my, has also contributed to understanding the physical makeup of our thoughts. 

Of course, it’s important to note that the field of thought interpretation using fMRI is vast and involves the contributions of many researchers over the years. It’s a continually evolving field with ongoing research. 

Publications of Dr Marks dealing with functional MRI and thought interpretation 

 Marks DH, Adineh M, Gupta S: Determination of Truth from Deception Using Functional MRI and Cognitive Engrams. The Internet Journal of Radiology. 2006. Volume 5, Number 1. 

Marks DH, Adineh M, Wang B, Gupta S, Udupa JK. Multidimensional Representation of Concepts as Cognitive Engrams in the Human Brain. The Internet Journal of Neurology. 2007. Volume 6, Number 1.

 Marks DH, Adineh M, Wang B, Gupta S. Use of fMRI to Predict Psychiatric Adverse Effects of Interferon Treatment for Hepatitis C. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2007:3(5) 655-667. 

 Marks DH, Adineh M, Gupta S. MR Imaging of Drug-Induced Suicidal Ideation. Internet J Radiology, 9(1). 2008. 

Marks DH, Valsasina P, Rocca M and Filippi M. Case Report: Documentation of Acute Neck Pain in a Patient Using Functional MR Imaging. Internet Journal of Pain, Symptom Control and Palliative Care. 2010, Vol 8(1). 

Marks DH, A Yildiz, S Vural, S Levy. Face Recognition, Reversible Correlation Between fMRI and Biometrics Data. The Internet Journal of Radiology. 2017 Volume 20 Number 1.

Guidelines to prescribing anti-psychotics to patients on methadone

Some Suggested Guidelines to Prescribing Anti-psychotics 

to Patients on Methadone


By Donald H. Marks MD PhD

2023 


With reference to disruptive patients with underlying psychosis or other mental health disorders in the presence of opioid use disorder, I want to bring up that prescribing and continuing methadone MTD for patients on antipsychotics can present several challenges, separate from psychological and counseling issues. As prescribers of methadone and refillers of antipsychotic medicines, we must consider several of these medical issues. Methadone used for opioid addiction treatment has drug-drug interactions between antipsychotics and methadone which can lead to adverse effects, and altered medication metabolism and effectiveness. Additionally, individuals on methadone may have complex medical and psychiatric histories, which can complicate treatment decisions for all these medicines. Close monitoring and coordination between healthcare providers and prescribing psychiatrists are crucial to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes. 


Taking certain medications with CNS effects during treatment with methadone may increase the risk of serious or life-threatening side effects such as breathing problems, sedation, or coma. 

CNS drugs that can interact with MTD include : antipsychotics such as aripiprazole (Abilify), asenapine (Saphris), cariprazine (Vraylar), chlorpromazine, clozapine (Versacloz), fluphenazine, haloperidol (Haldol), iloperidone (Fanapt), loxapine, lurasidone (Latuda), molindone, olanzapine (Zyprexa), paliperidone (Invega), perphenazine, pimavanserin (Nuplazid), quetiapine (Seroquel), risperidone (Risperdal), thioridazine, thiothixene, trifluoperazine, and ziprasidone (Geodon); benzodiazepines such as alprazolam (Xanax), chlordiazepoxide (Librium), clonazepam (Klonopin), clorazepate (Gen-Xene, Tranxene), diazepam (Diastat, Valium), estazolam, flurazepam, lorazepam (Ativan), oxazepam, temazepam (Restoril), and triazolam (Halcion); opiate (narcotic) medications for pain and cough; medications for nausea or mental illness; muscle relaxants; sedatives; sleeping pills; or tranquilizers. 

Patients should be monitored carefully, in conjunction / coordination with the prescribers of these CNS meds. Patients should be warned of unusual dizziness, lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness. Caregivers or family members should be made aware, with the patient’s permission, of which symptoms may be serious so they can call the doctor or emergency medical care if the patient is unable to seek treatment on their own.


For the safety of patients and staff , we need to keep all these issues in mind. In particular, medical staff are not just the prescriber of medication but also MCAC and SCAC can also be the drug dispensors, so dispensing large quantities of medication can be problematic in terms of drugs interactions, safety, effectiveness, and danger to the patient and the community. 


Continued involvement with patients should be part of a multidisciplinary meeting where everyone can have input and appropriate decisions can be made. 



References


Marks Donald H. 2023. Cocaine Use in the setting of Methadone treatment for Opioid Use Disorder

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YE072K39xeCar3ziHhEJLlS9LD1AYHTLmgHa_j82SAI/edit?usp=sharing 


Marks DH. Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment. Internet J Health. 8(1), 2008.

Marks DH. Evaluation of Medical Causation, in Drug Injury: Liability, Analysis and Prevention, 3rd and 4th Editions,  O’Donnell JT editor. L&J Publications, 2012 and 2016.

Marks DH and Middlekoop T. Accutane: Focus on Psychiatric Toxicity and Suicide, in Drug Injury: Liability, Analysis and Prevention, Second Edition, Chapter 20. O’Donnell JT editor. L&J Publications, 2005. 


Wednesday, April 17, 2024

PTSD and anxiety, there's an app to help that. And just maybe help you get off all your toxic meds?


https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2yYYa0_0rWbHG7O00

Photo bySimon HurryonUnsplash

Full disclosure, I am a medical doctor, and many of my patients have psych disorders like anxiety depression, PTSD and manic-like illness. While I do occasionally treat psych disorders, I am not a psychiatrist. But many of these patients who need or could benefit from medication and psychotherapy simply can not afford it, or don't have access to care.

Here is the good news and the hope. There are apps specifically designed to help individuals cope with PTSD anxiety and depression symptoms. These apps, and more are coming, can provide tools for managing anxiety, stress, and triggers, as well as offering resources for relaxation, mindfulness, and grounding techniques. Some apps also offer cognitive behavioral therapy exercises, guided meditations, and mood-tracking features to help users better understand and manage their symptoms.

While apps can be a helpful supplement to traditional therapy and medication, it's important to remember that they are not a replacement for professional medical advice. It's always recommended to consult with a healthcare provider before making any changes to your treatment plan, including reducing or stopping medication.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1yuu0b_0rWbHG7O00

pills in a bottlePhoto byAlexander GreyonUnsplash

Ultimately, whether or not an app can help someone get off medications for PTSD anxiety depression will depend on the individual's unique circumstances and the severity of their symptoms. It's crucial to approach treatment holistically and work closely with healthcare professionals to determine the most effective and safe approach. It's essential to view these apps as tools to complement existing treatment strategies rather than a cure-all solution. Building a comprehensive support system that includes professional guidance, self-care practices, and possibly app-based tools can enhance overall well-being. Each person's journey with PTSD is unique, so it's vital to personalize the treatment approach with a healthcare provider's guidance and supervision.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1yT1fu_0rWbHG7O00

smartphone appsPhoto byNathan DumlaoonUnsplash

In navigating the possibility of reducing medication use, it's crucial to prioritize safety and well-being. Collaboration with healthcare professionals can help individuals make informed decisions about their treatment plan, considering factors like symptom management, potential risks, and overall progress. Finding the right balance between medication, therapy, self-care practices, and technological tools can empower individuals in their healing process and promote advocate for improved healthcare access.


Sunday, February 18, 2024

Should ALL Medical Doctors Be Required to Accept Medicare and Medicaid $$$ as a Condition of Licensure? Can the Gods be humble and care for their lowly helpless subjects?

Should Medical Doctors Be Required to Accept Medicare and Medicaid as a Condition of Licensure?





By Donald H. Marks, MD PhD, FACP   physician and scientist
Reason, ethics, health equity, 3rd generation Veteran

Medicare and Medicaid are two government programs that provide health coverage to millions of Americans. Medicare covers 67 million citizens ages 65 and over, as well as 8 million younger adults with certain chronic conditions or disabilities. Medicaid is a joint federal-state program that provides health insurance to low-income individuals and families. To date, 41 states (including DC) have adopted the Medicaid expansion, and as of June 2023, approximately 94 million persons are covered by Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program CHIP.  


Having insurance coverage is not the same as having access to care,  because not all doctors accept Medicare and Medicaid patients. Are you shocked, surprised or offended? According to a survey by the American Medical Association, in 2018, 90% of physicians accept new Medicare patients, while only 72% accepted new Medicaid patients. The main reasons cited for this discrepancy are the low reimbursement rates and the high administrative burden of dealing with these programs. I have faced this very frustrating situation in my own medical practice and in my own personal life as an over 65 medical patient, turned away by a large local hospital-affiliated orthopedic surgery group which does not accept Medicare.

Interesting discussion of medical equity and access to care, on Star Trek https://youtube.com/shorts/MNbADGu_0Z0?si=e3owA2sTyhy7GliE


Some healthcare equity advocates argue that all medical doctors should be required to accept Medicare and Medicaid as a condition of their medical license. They claim that this would ensure access to quality health care for all Americans, regardless of their income or age. They also point out that medical doctors have a social responsibility to serve the public good, and that accepting government insurance is part of their professional duty.


Some opponents contend that medical doctors should have the freedom to choose their patients and their payment methods. They assert that forcing medical doctors to accept Medicare and Medicaid would violate their autonomy and their property rights. They also warn that such a mandate could reduce the supply and quality of doctors, as some would retire early, relocate to other states, or opt out of the system altogether.


Public Funding of Physician Training

All physicians in the United States receive some form of public funding during their training. This funding can come from a variety of sources, including:

  • Federal funding: The federal government provides funding for medical schools, residency programs, and other healthcare training programs through a variety of programs, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). Another form of federal funding, which I benefited from, is military sponsorship.

  • State funding: Many state governments also provide funding for medical schools and residency programs.

  • Local funding: Some local governments also provide funding for healthcare training programs.

In addition to government funding, many physicians also receive financial assistance from private sources, such as scholarships and loans. However, even these private sources of funding often rely on government support in some way. For example, many student loans are guaranteed by the federal government.

Obligation to Accept Medicaid Patients

Because all physicians receive some form of public funding during their training, many healthcare equity advocates argue that medical doctors have an obligation to accept Medicare and Medicaid patients.

There are a number of reasons why physicians should accept Medicaid patients. First, it is a way to repay the public for the investment that was made in their training. Second, it helps to ensure that everyone has access to quality healthcare, regardless of their income. Third, it can help to reduce the burden on the uninsured healthcare system.

Challenges

There are a number of challenges that physicians face when accepting Medicaid patients. One challenge is that Medicaid reimbursement rates are often (but not always) lower than those of private insurance companies. This can make it difficult for physicians to cover the costs of providing care to Medicare/Medicaid patients.

Another challenge is that Medicaid patients often can have more complex medical needs. This can make it more time-consuming and difficult to provide care to Medicare/Medicaid patients.

While it's important to encourage healthcare providers to participate in government healthcare programs like Medicaid and Medicare, denying medical doctors a medical license solely for not accepting these programs may not be the most effective or ethical approach. Instead, it may be more effective to incentivize their participation through other means, such as matching Medicare Medicaid to BC/ BS or Kaiser rates. Here's why:

1. Ethical Considerations: Denying medical doctors a medical license based solely on their participation in specific insurance programs could be seen as discriminatory and heavy-handed. All licensed medical professionals should be treated equally, but their primary commitment should be to provide quality health care to patients, regardless of their insurance status.


2. Access to Care: Restricting access to care by revoking licenses may be counter-productive, by exacerbating the shortage of healthcare providers, especially in underserved areas. A better approach may be to encourage more doctors to accept Medicaid and Medicare patients by offering realistic reimbursement rates which also represent the cost of providing care, and lowering administrative barriers.


3. Focus on Quality of Care: Licensing should primarily ensure that medical doctors are qualified and capable of providing high-quality care. Accepting or not accepting specific insurance should not be the sole determinant of a physician's qualifications.


4. Individual Choice: Doctors often have valid reasons for not participating in government insurance programs, such as administrative burdens or low reimbursement rates. Some hold that it is essential to respect their professional judgment and provide incentives for participation rather than punitive measures.


5. Incentivize Participation: Instead of punitive measures, it may be better to create incentives for medical doctors to participate in Medicaid and Medicare. These could include improved reimbursement rates, reduced administrative burdens, or offering tax incentives for providers who accept a certain percentage of patients from these programs.


6. Patient Choice: Patients should have the freedom to choose their doctors. Forcing doctors to accept specific insurance could limit patient choice and interfere with the doctor-patient relationship, which is crucial for effective healthcare.


Of course it's crucial to encourage medical doctors to participate in Medicaid and Medicare without resorting to revoking medical licenses, although the alternative of denying access to healthcare to the sick is even more onerous, IMO. By addressing the issues that deter doctors from participating and providing incentives, we may perhaps ensure that more healthcare providers accept patients from these programs while upholding ethical standards and individual choice.


From a health equity and ethics standpoint, are medical doctors who refuse to accept Medicaid or Medicare simply greedy? 

Health equity is the principle that everyone should have a fair and just opportunity to attain their highest level of health, regardless of their income, race, ethnicity, gender, disability, or other factors that may affect their access to health care (CDC What is Health Equity? | Health Equity | CDC). By electing not to accept Medicaid or Medicare patients, even though these programs provide essential life-supporting health insurance for millions of low-income, elderly, and disabled Americans (https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-equity), those non-participating medical doctors are actively and intentionally denying patients the right to health and contribute to the health disparities that result from their unequal access to quality health care.

One might argue that doctors who refuse to accept Medicaid or Medicare are greedy because they prioritize their own financial interests over the health needs of their patients. According to a report by the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC), the average Medicaid payment for 18 selected conditions was 6 percent higher than Medicare in 2012 (https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/healthequity/index.html ). Moreover, the average Medicaid payment for all but two of the conditions was higher than Medicare. This means that doctors who reject Medicaid patients are not only discriminating against poor and needy patients, but also losing out on potential revenue.


Another reason why doctors who refuse to accept Medicaid or Medicare might be considered greedy is that they are ignoring the social determinants of health that affect their potential patients’ well-being. Social determinants of health are the conditions in which people live, learn, work, play, and worship that influence their health risks and outcomes (https://www.cdc.gov/healthequity/whatis/index.html). These include factors such as discrimination, racism, poverty, education, employment, housing, transportation, economic status, and environment. By turning their backs on Medicaid or Medicare patients in favor of better paying patients, those doctors are failing to address the root causes of poor health and perpetuating the cycle of disadvantage and disease.

Therefore, from a health equity standpoint, doctors who refuse to accept Medicaid or Medicare could be considered greedy because they violate the principle of fairness and justice in healthcare. They also miss the opportunity to improve the health outcomes of patients and reduce the burden of preventable diseases on society.


The American College of Physicians, the internal medicine professional society to which I belong as an Emeritis Fellow, has a vision for improving healthcare access in America. ACP provides a comprehensive, interconnected set of policies for a better U.S. healthcare system for all. 


The first of ACP comprehensive recommendations is that USA should transition to universal coverage, which includes essential benefits, which I and most US citizens and healthcare providers agree. Prior US presidents, including FDR, Nixon and Clinton have agreed. 


ACP vision challenges the U.S. not to settle for the status quo, but to implement systematic health care reforms. An additional set of ACP policy papers, published in Annals of Internal Medicine, address issues related to coverage and cost of care, health care payment and delivery systems, barriers to care and social determinants of health, and more. 


Although essentially a commendable set of proposals, I look forward to ACP giving more attention to the "essentially uninsured", meaning those with unaffordable premiums, high deductibles, and poor access to providers. Not being able to afford healthcare is equivalent to not having access to healthcare. For many, it's essentially not available. In addition, if a drug is priced in a way that results in it being unaffordable, it is essentially not available to those in need, and in that sense of no efficacy. Drugs found to have no efficacy should have their approval from FDA revoked.

 

Solutions

The issue of whether medical doctors should be required to participate in Medicare and Medicaid is a complex and controversial one. It involves ethical, economic, and legal considerations that affect both doctors and patients. 


I look forward to your comments on all these issues.




References


Physicians who refuse to accept Medicaid patients breach their contract with society https://www.statnews.com/2017/12/28/medicaid-physicians-social-contract/


What is Health Equity? | Health Equity | CDC

https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/healthequity/index.html

https://www.cdc.gov/healthequity/whatis/index.html


Health Equity. WHO. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-equity



Personal blog of Donald H. Marks, where one can find most of my personal and professional writings, and links to my podcases. www.DHMarks.blogspot.com


Reducing the influence of politics in healthcare. Donald H. Marks https://dhmarks.blogspot.com/2023/08/reducing-influence-of-politics-in.html


Better is Possible: ACP's Vision for the U.S. Health Care System. My comments.  https://dhmarks.blogspot.com/2020/04/httpsannalsorgaimfullarticle2759528envi.html




My Blog List